Re: Union of sets (lists
Re: Union of sets (lists
- Subject: Re: Union of sets (lists
- From: Doug McNutt <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 17:55:57 -0700
At 16:49 -0700 1/11/03, Michelle Steiner wrote:
>
set foo to union(SetA, SetB)
>
>
to union(a, b)
SNIP
>
end union
I have no idea what that "natural English" is supposed to mean. Is the function name "to union" with an included space or is "to" a reserved word which is looking for a module named "union" which it finds because the "to" in the function definition is ignored?
And besides that, won't
SetC = SetA & SetB
work? It seems to meet the requirements of natural English. One can certainly add a single variable to a list that way. Well, perhaps duplication of elements is a problem. . . but my real question is the syntax.
--
--> If you are presented a number as a percentage, and you do not clearly understand the numerator and the denominator involved, you are surely being lied to. <--
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.