• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: URL Access: Limit on URL Length?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: URL Access: Limit on URL Length?


  • Subject: Re: URL Access: Limit on URL Length?
  • From: Harald E Brandt <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 00:35:22 +0100

A topic from november, but I am behind schedule....

+--> ken wrote 02-11-05:
After reading John Pugh's post, I figured I better
go double check! I just sent a URL to "URL
Access Scripting" where the form data alone
was 428 characters, not counting the URL itself,
and it worked fine.
+-
and...

+--> Jon Pugh wrote 02-11-05:
At 1:48 PM -0600 11/5/02, ken wrote:
For those who care, my test
was on OS X 10.1.5 with the classic URL
Access Scripting v2.5.

So, 9.1 versus 10.1.5. That explains a lot, and this is why I always run the latest version of everything.


This particular issue is something I investigated carefully a year ago on Mac OS 9.2 and URL AS 2.4. My very clear conclusion was that the character limit was 261 characters total to URL AS. That's precisely 256 characters plus "http"!

The test was a "simple" download using a regular url with a long argument of stock quote tickers like "?s=ACTIb.ST+ARTIb.ST+BCOR.ST+BOL.ST+..." etcetera. It was NOT a limitation of the server, since I testet that IE could use more than 261 characters, so it was a limit in URL AS.
My solution was to make a loop, where I made several downloads of a maximum of 20 tickers at a time until I got all. A bit tedious coding....

I am a bit surprised you say that limitation was eliminated by Classic URL AS 2.5 under OS X. But since my package works well under Mac OS X/Classic all the way down to Mac OS 8.6, I don't intend to mess with it any further - it was dreadfully complicated! But I might reconsider my scripts when I make a Mac OS X native version of the package.

Regards,
--heb


________________________________________________________
Harald E Brandt email@hidden http://bragit.com
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Prev by Date: Re: Test for BSD subsystem
  • Next by Date: Union of sets (lists
  • Previous by thread: Re: text appears, but styling is gone
  • Next by thread: Union of sets (lists
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread