• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Why is AS so poorly documented?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why is AS so poorly documented?


  • Subject: Re: Why is AS so poorly documented?
  • From: Dave Balderstone <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 08:37:33 -0600

On Wednesday, July 23, 2003, at 12:56 AM, Matthew Smith wrote:

Current documentation for AppleScript may include some documentation for
some scripting additions (like Standard Additions) and application
dictionaries (like Finder), but can't cater for all scripting additions and
application dictionaries. Of course, trying to document scripting additions
and application dictionaries in documentation for AppleScript is quite
difficult, when they can change quite quickly. As has been stated recently,
there is a difference between the dictionaries for iTunes 4.0 and iTunes
4.01, and there was only a few months between there releases.

Which brings the discussion back to a point I've seen raised here before, that many people find the AS dictionaries obtuse and difficult to read.

I rather think the problem is that the dictionaries are written in a dialect that people (this is a BROAD generalization) haven't taken the time to learn. EG:

set reference -- the object for the command
Result: anything -- the reply for the command

looks confusing as hell to someone looking at it cold, but after working with AS for a period of time and learning the dialect (via the language guides, the various books on the market, and excellent web resources like MacScripter and The AppleScript Sourcebook to name just two) it's easy to understand.

So, I wonder... when people cry for "better documentation" are they just looking for an example (perhaps in the app's dictionary) per entry or are they really looking for step-by-step "how to" guides?

As an analogy, I see a big pile of Lego pieces. Do I just need some pictures of *some* things that *can* be built with the pieces I have, or do I require detailed instructions to build specific things?

djb
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Re: Why is AS so poorly documented? (From: Matthew Smith <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Watched Folders
  • Next by Date: Mount server
  • Previous by thread: Re: Why is AS so poorly documented?
  • Next by thread: Re: Why is AS so poorly documented?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread