Re: Searching for the equivalent of coercing to type "record"
Re: Searching for the equivalent of coercing to type "record"
- Subject: Re: Searching for the equivalent of coercing to type "record"
- From: julifos <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 10:03:49 +0100
>
On 3/7/03 7:41 PM, "Jeffrey Mattox" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>
>> ----------------------------
>
>> run script ("{<<class usrf>>:{\"a\", \"b\"}} as record")
>
>> --> {a:"b"}
>
>> ----------------------------
>
>
>
> Great, informative thread. But still unanswered is where does one go
>
> to get details on all these nifty chevronisms (OS X), including how
>
> to use them?
>
>
Here.
>
>
--
>
Paul Berkowitz
And some old-old docs... Do you remember the Apple Doc Viewer? ;-)
Anyway, I've been following this thread and I don't know why are your
forcing the usrf'ing, instead declarate the record as is?
set usrf_key to "user record field!"
set usrf_value to "some words..."
run script "{|" & usrf_key & "|:\"" & usrf_value & "\"}"
-->
As a sidenote, as long as I know, if you're running under classic, you don't
need "run script". This works under 9.1, AS 1.8.2b3, running applet:
set x to record {+class usrf;:{"label", "value"}}
display dialog "I'm a " & (x's label) --> "I'm a value"
JJ
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.