Re: "idle" has different effect in X vs 9?
Re: "idle" has different effect in X vs 9?
- Subject: Re: "idle" has different effect in X vs 9?
- From: Shane Stanley <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 10:30:25 +1000
On 9/5/03 10:11 AM +1000, Christopher Nebel, email@hidden, wrote:
>
'do shell script "sleep"' just calls sleep(3), which is almost perfectly
>
efficient -- zero CPU usage.
>
Yes, but think of all the time wasted in calling "do script" rather than a
scripting addition.
;-)
--
Shane Stanley, email@hidden
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.