Re: The way dictionaries ought to be
Re: The way dictionaries ought to be
- Subject: Re: The way dictionaries ought to be
- From: Emmanuel <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 12:30:21 +0200
At 11:14 AM -0700 21/05/03, Andy Bachorski wrote:
>
on 21 May 2003 08:15:24 -0600, Doug McNutt <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> While looking further into usage of the unary minus I found this:
>
>
>
> <http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mwidholm/MathPad/manual/AEvents.html>
>
>
>
> It ought to be required reading for all publishers of scriptable applications.
>
>
Why?
I suppose Doug means, "as an example of a non-object implementation".
But there are better examples. That I know: Kaleidagraph and Canvas.
Emmanuel
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.