• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Faster List Checking
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Faster List Checking


  • Subject: Re: Faster List Checking
  • From: Paul Berkowitz <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 14:41:10 -0700

On 5/28/03 2:15 PM, "Andrew Oliver" <email@hidden> wrote:

> Also, the line:
>
>> repeat with i from 1 to (count text items in errorlist)
>
> Can be optimized to:
>
>> set numItems to count text items in errorList
>> repeat with I from 1 to numItems
>
> In the original form, the script will calculate the 'count text items in
> errorlist' each time it goes through the loop.
> By precalculating the number of items in the list you save time.
> You can only use this technique when you know the list won't change. If
> you're adding or subtracting items from the list you need to recalculate the
> number of items in the list on each iteration, but in your script there's no
> need.


This is in fact not the case. It counts before the repeat loop and not
during. If in fact you _do_ delete or remove anything from the list, it will
error when i turns out to be larger than the last remaining item index, plus
you will have skipped some items en route. (What does get recalculated is
'item i of errorList' since it is within the repeat loop. What does not get
recalculated is ' count text items in errorList' which is outside the loop.)
Hence the recommendation to always work backwards if deleting items
dynamically from a list.

--
Paul Berkowitz
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Re: Faster List Checking (From: Andrew Oliver <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Need a faster Find Duplicates Routine
  • Next by Date: Re: applescripted login
  • Previous by thread: Re: Faster List Checking
  • Next by thread: Re: Faster List Checking
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread