• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Workaround for terminology conflicts
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Workaround for terminology conflicts


  • Subject: Workaround for terminology conflicts
  • From: HOnza Koudelka <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 11:34:55 +0200

Hi!

I am looking for opinions about using "System Events" versus "Finder" for working around terminology conflicts.

For example, Finder and FileMaker Pro don't interpret the "kind" keyword equally.

To prevent terminology conflicts and also to avoid creating new global terms where not needed, we have adopted the Finder's interpretation of the word "kind" in our scripting addition.

The problem is that scripts using this term don't compile correctly in FileMaker Pro, and so they don't work. As a workaround, we recommend to our users to enclose the critical command(s) in the using terms from application "Finder" block.

I am wondering what other people think about this workaround. Is it the right one? Shouldn't we use "System Events" rather than "Finder"? What do you think?

HOnza
--
HOnza Koudelka
Quality Manager, 24U Software
Associate Member, Filemaker Solutions Alliance
mailto:email@hidden
http://www.24uSoftware.com
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Workaround for terminology conflicts
      • From: Michelle Steiner <email@hidden>
    • Re: Workaround for terminology conflicts
      • From: Walter Ian Kaye <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: Calling a script object
  • Next by Date: Re: Dates gone wild
  • Previous by thread: done! (was: Re: delay procedure for waiting less than a second)
  • Next by thread: Re: Workaround for terminology conflicts
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread