Re: Image thumbnails question
Re: Image thumbnails question
- Subject: Re: Image thumbnails question
- From: Walter Ian Kaye <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:33:34 -0700
At 09:50p -0500 09/23/2003, Steve Mills didst inscribe upon an
electronic papyrus:
On Tuesday, Sep 23, 2003, at 17:38 US/Central, Shane Stanley wrote:
Strange and goofy? What do you mean?
I've never seen the need to have "picture boxes", especially in some
apps where you have to make a box first, then place a graphic in it.
And since I've been with MultiAd starting in 1995, I'm very used to
using a page layout app that doesn't do it that way.
I don't have ID, but maybe they do it that way for consistency and
generality, such as [[object=text]] + [[object=picture]] +
[[object=future-use]]. Like maybe they did it for forward
compatibility, so that your ID 1.x scripts will still work in ID 9.x.
If so, I would think it's a worthwhile tradeoff.
-boo
only guessing.
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.