• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: promiscuity and driving (was: Going to be out of touch for a while)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: promiscuity and driving (was: Going to be out of touch for a while)


  • Subject: Re: promiscuity and driving (was: Going to be out of touch for a while)
  • From: David Durkee <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:26:08 -0500

Not sure I agree.

"Condoms encourage pregnancy
- in the same way that seat belts encourage automobile accidents."

Well, condoms are intended to prevent pregnancy (among other things), but seat belts are not intended to prevent accidents. This is also beside the point, since I think the original speaker was trying to argue against the first premise, that condoms encourage promiscuity, which you have removed from the comparison.

"Condoms encourage promiscuity
- in the same way that seat belts encourage driving."

This one is better, since condoms are intended to reduce the dangers of promiscuity and seat belts are intended to reduce the dangers of driving. Condoms and seat belts are safety devices, promiscuity and driving are behaviors. And they are related in similar ways. But while promiscuity is assumed to implied to be an aberrant behavior, or at least an extreme expression of a particular behavior (sexuality), driving is generally considered normal. To make it balance better, I suggest "reckless driving."

"Condoms encourage promiscuity
- in the same way that seat belts encourage reckless driving."

This balances much better. It might not carry the same rhetorical impact as the original, though. In fact, it might now be used as an argument against seat belts.

David


On Thursday, September 25, 2003, at 02:22 PM, Walter Ian Kaye wrote:

At 02:18a -0700 09/25/2003, Michelle Steiner didst inscribe upon an electronic papyrus:

"Condoms encourage promiscuity
- in the same way that seat belts encourage automobile accidents."
O.C. Brown

Now there's some flawed logic. Correct analogies would be as follows:

"Condoms encourage pregnancy
- in the same way that seat belts encourage automobile accidents."

"Condoms encourage promiscuity
- in the same way that seat belts encourage driving."


-boo
ensuring logical thinking on a programming list :)
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


--
David Durkee
email@hidden
<http://ddurkee.homeip.net/>
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • [OT] Re: promiscuity and driving (was: Going to be out of touch for a while)
      • From: Chris Page <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Going to be out of touch for a while (From: Walter Ian Kaye <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: When = == ?
  • Next by Date: Re: Handler defies logic
  • Previous by thread: Re: Going to be out of touch for a while
  • Next by thread: [OT] Re: promiscuity and driving (was: Going to be out of touch for a while)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread