Re: (2 of 2) Application Scripting Question - Theoretical? (was Re: Technote 2106 is da Bomb)
Re: (2 of 2) Application Scripting Question - Theoretical? (was Re: Technote 2106 is da Bomb)
- Subject: Re: (2 of 2) Application Scripting Question - Theoretical? (was Re: Technote 2106 is da Bomb)
- From: Michael Terry <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:08:47 -0700
On Apr 14, 2004, at 3:14 PM, John W. Baxter wrote:
OK, you make a good point. But you have to understand that I consider
that an implementation detail which doesn't take priority over
language
usefulness.
Some here seem to be talking about "what I would like."
Others are talking about "what is."
Things will proceed with more understanding if we make clear who is
talking
about which...although the likelihood of the "what I would like" branch
coming to an agreement is perhaps small.
This reminds me that there's a teensy part of me, locked so far down
inside I can hardly hear his mad chuckles, that hopes the fragment
"[r]eserved words in AppleScript 1" from Technote 2106 carries a hidden
meaning.
Mike
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.