Re: do visual basic
Re: do visual basic
- Subject: Re: do visual basic
- From: Paul Berkowitz <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:45:58 -0800
I was just referring to the post I sent at 8:56 AM PST this morning, not one
from January. You probably hadn't received it when you wrote your first
reply at 9:08 PST, but surely you must have got it by the time you sent your
next message in the thread, at 9:49 AM? After all, you were replying to my
_second_ post (sent at 9:26 AM) at that point - had you really not seen my
first post? I can believe anything of this list server, but it seems quite
well-behaved today. It just looked to me as if you hadn't read my first
message in the thread so I was trying to get your attention this time. ;-)
--
Paul Berkowitz
>
From: Andrew Oliver <email@hidden>
>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:02:53 -0800
>
To: Paul Berkowitz <email@hidden>, AppleScript-Users
>
<email@hidden>
>
Subject: Re: do visual basic
>
>
You're right, Paul. I did find a post of yours back in January 2004 where
>
you do say that VB can't/doesn't return a result to AppleScript.
>
>
I'm sorry for my inability to remember every word you say 2 months later.
>
>
Andrew
>
:)
>
>
On 3/10/04 10:19 AM, "Paul Berkowitz" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> You're not paying attention. Andrew. I've written twice that NO, better
>
> VBScripters than you cannot return a value to AppleScript. It can't be done.
>
> The result of 'do Visual Basic' is always 'undefined' in AppleScript.
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.