Re: Bridge anyone? [not off topic]
Re: Bridge anyone? [not off topic]
- Subject: Re: Bridge anyone? [not off topic]
- From: Andrew Oliver <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 23:41:16 -0800
On 11/2/04 11:33 PM, "Malcolm Fitzgerald" <email@hidden> wrote:
> David Andrews wrote:
>
>> set north to items 1 thru 13 of hands
>> set east to items 14 thru 26 of hands
>> set south to items 27 thru 39 of hands
>> set west to items 40 thru 52 of hands
>> {north, east, south, west}
>> -------------------------------
>
>
> What is going on here? We're not playing "fish". In bridge the cards are
> dealt, clockwise, from a shuffled deck.
>
Who cares?
If the deck is sufficiently shuffled there is no effective difference
between giving each hand consecutive cards or dealing them in the same way
you would do it manually.
Andrew
:)
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden