Re: Vote!
Re: Vote!
- Subject: Re: Vote!
- From: Michael Gmail <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 06:15:31 -0500
At the risk of wandering even further off-topic, and possibly
launching a flame war while I'm at it, there's a (highly partisan!)
overview of the statistical anomalies that seem to indicate that
massive fraud did occur in 2004 here: <http://www.projectcensored.org/
newsflash/voter_fraud.html>. If anyone has contrary evidence or a
substantiated alternative explanation of what happened, I'd be very
interested in seeing it, though this list is probably not the place
for it.
Michael
On Aug 15, 2005, at 11:47 PM, Jeff Porten wrote:
A stack of computer scientists have confirmed repeatedly that
electronic voting is custom-designed to allow a few people to
commit wholesale fraud on a scale never before seen in a democratic
state. The systems' defenders argue that there is no proof of
fraud -- and of course there is not, because these machines were
mostly *designed* to destroy evidence of their workings on the
fly. It is IMPOSSIBLE TO KNOW whether the 2004 election was
rigged. Regardless of whether you like the result of the 2004
election, I think that all computer professionals can turn an
apolitical eye to this design and say that it would be rejected out
of hand for managing a cash register, let alone the presidential
election.
--
<http://globalocal.blogspot.com/>
In the midst of the word he was trying to say,
In the midst of his laughter and glee,
He had softly and suddenly vanished away---
For the Snark *was* a Boojum, you see.
- Lewis Carroll
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Vote!
- From: "Dennis W. Manasco" <email@hidden>
| References: | |
| | >Re: Vote! (From: blackcat <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Vote! (From: Jeff Porten <email@hidden>) |