• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: iWork Pages
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: iWork Pages


  • Subject: Re: iWork Pages
  • From: Peter Bunn <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:49:34 -0600

At the risk of getting my head caved in...

I agree *in principal* it's absurd for Apple not to be making their own
apps scriptable.

Yet... hasn't there been something of a 'tradition', habit or tendency
through the years for Apple to deliberately offer selected apps in
'minimalist' form (perhaps directed toward 'consumers' rather than
professionals) so as not to step on third party developers?

I mean... SimpleText or TextEdit could easily have been as capable as
BBEdit  I doubt it's a lack of talent at Apple that limited either one.

Would Smile or Script Debugger exist if ScriptEditor did it all?

Would Adobe or Quark continue developing for the Mac platform if Pages
could really compete at the same level?

I'll go quietly now.

Peter B.

-----

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: iWork Pages
      • From: "John C. Welch" <email@hidden>
    • Re: iWork Pages
      • From: Bill Briggs <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: (no subject)
  • Next by Date: Re: iWork Pages
  • Previous by thread: Re: iWork Pages
  • Next by thread: Re: iWork Pages
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread