Re: CURL vs FTP
Re: CURL vs FTP
- Subject: Re: CURL vs FTP
- From: Doug McNutt <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:08:08 -0600
At 12:30 -0700 6/17/05, Bruce Robertson wrote:
>I am dealing with a client whose web host company insists that we use FTP
>not CURL, because he insists that he only supports FTP.
>
>Does this make sense? Isn't CURL just a particular way of controlling FTP?
No to the first. Yes to the second, but curl also does http, telnet and some others..
curl parses the URL you hand it and, if it's an ftp protocol curl will do the right thing. The other end has no idea that the ftp client you have chosen is in fact curl.
curl also allows you to specify user and password in the URL
ftp://myusername:email@hidden/newdata/
and also in a $HOME/.netrc file which you create with a list of servers and passwords as text. That's curl's -n option which will allow you to keep the upload command as a comment in an html file ready for execution in terminal.
Unlike Finder Connect To Server, curl allows uploads.
--
--> The best programming tool is a soldering iron <--
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
References: | |
| >CURL vs FTP (From: Bruce Robertson <email@hidden>) |