Re: New Tiger dictionary format example posted
Re: New Tiger dictionary format example posted
- Subject: Re: New Tiger dictionary format example posted
- From: has <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 22:02:26 +0100
Bill Cheeseman wrote:
> >>> I'm missing the old "by name, by numeric index, before/after another
> >>> element, as a range of elements, satisfying a test, by ID"
> >>
> >> It has become redundant, or perhaps I should say unnecessary.
> >
> > Not true....
>
>Actually, I agree with you -- and not just for your reasons, but also as a
>general principle.
>
>I should have made clear that I was paraphrasing an unidentified "official"
>source.
I hope they meant it's unnecessary for Cocoa application developers to specify element accessor information manually in their sdefs, not that it's unnecessary for dictionary viewers to display element accessor information to users. The latter would be a pretty embarrassing failure in joined-up thinking, in which case it's lucky for them that they remain "unidentified" to spare their eternal blushes. :p
has
--
http://freespace.virgin.net/hamish.sanderson/
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden