Re: Nice Automator article on O'Reilly
Re: Nice Automator article on O'Reilly
- Subject: Re: Nice Automator article on O'Reilly
- From: "John C. Welch" <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 18:16:21 -0500
On 5/4/05 15:30, "has" <email@hidden> wrote:
> If anything, it's probably better that Apple don't rush to add half-assed
> scripting support while simultaneously juggling a hundred other requirements
> for a pre-1.0 release, but wait till the initial chaos is out the way and take
> their time to do a [one can hope] proper job of it for v2.0. If you're really
> concerned about the state of scripting support in Apple's newest 1.0 apps,
> there are plenty of older Apple apps which could do with a bug report or ten
> filed against their current implementations before you need to start worrying
> about any new ones.
I just wish we didn't have as many 2.0 applications with .9 dictionaries.
--
"You humans call this thing a 'cursor' and you move it with 'mouse'! Bah!
A Klingon would not use such a device. We have a Karaghht-Gnot - which is
best translated as "An Aiming Daggar of 16x16 pixels" and we move it using
a Gshnarrrf which is a creature from the Klingon homeworld which posesses
just one, (disproportionately large) testicle...which it rubs along the
ground...a fearsome creature indeed.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden