Re: To Matt: Problem Sending AppleScripts as Text: The Resource Fork
Re: To Matt: Problem Sending AppleScripts as Text: The Resource Fork
- Subject: Re: To Matt: Problem Sending AppleScripts as Text: The Resource Fork
- From: Daniel Jalkut <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 10:12:53 -0400
| I generally like Matt's reasoning. And with regard to the description - I have always found that text to be so flakey (I remember losing it randomly in the past) that I have long since switched to doing the "standard thing" of just adding a long comment header to the top of the script.
Daniel On Oct 7, 2005, at 10:02 AM, Matt Neuburg wrote: I grant that the fact that in some formats the Description is in the resource fork is annoying, but that simply further supports my point, which is that a compiled script file is often kind of a bad thing. Anyhow, loss of the Description is nowhere near as significant as loss of the script's content, which is, you must admit, usually the chief information the sender wishes to convey.
|
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden