Re: recursion depth
Re: recursion depth
- Subject: Re: recursion depth
- From: John Baltutis <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 14:29:45 -0700
On 10/09/05, Matt Neuburg <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> Okay, let's all test the depth of recursion, please.
>
> on remvix(L, ix)
> if L is {} then return {}
> if ix is 1 then
> return rest of L
> else
> return item 1 of L & remvix(rest of L, ix - 1)
> end if
> end remvix
> set L to {}
> set max to 504
> repeat with x from 1 to max
> set end of L to x
> end repeat
> remvix(L, max)
>
> OMM, that works, but if "max" is set to 505, we get a stack overflow.
> However, other users report other numbers. So now I'd like to collect some
> more data. Please report what your maximum "max" is (and anything else you
> think might be affecting this - your ram size, for instance?).
->Stack overflow w/max GE 505.
>
> To make this easier, the following *might* be a correct testing algorithm,
> though I'm not entirely certain:
->502 on a G4, 450 MP, 1.5 GB RAM, 10.4.2.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden