• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: scripting Word top copy text - should be simple, but ain't
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: scripting Word top copy text - should be simple, but ain't


  • Subject: Re: scripting Word top copy text - should be simple, but ain't
  • From: Paul Berkowitz <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:41:24 -0700
  • Thread-topic: scripting Word top copy text - should be simple, but ain't

On 4/27/06 8:26 AM, "Jon Pugh" <email@hidden> wrote:

> At 7:39 AM -0700 4/27/06, Paul Berkowitz wrote:
>> Perhaps someone can say definitely if it is permitted for an application to
>> provide a Result to 'open' command in the Standard Suite.
>
> It is permitted, but generally ignored.
>
> You can tell if an AppleEvent reply will be ignored, and all events from the
> Finder are ignored, or sent with the flag kAENoReply.  Thus, it is pointless
> to return data to them.   However, if someone else were to send an open event,
> they could leave off the kAENoReply flag and get a response if one was
> returned.
>
> If a reply is returned to the Finder, it will be ignored.

Thanks, Jon.

I think I'll file a feature request to Word to add an 'open document'
command that returns a result. But this doesn't affect the main 'open' issue
for all apps.

I suppose it's a Good Thing that you can tell unscriptable apps to open a
document file created by them, and therefore 'open' should not have to
require a result. But it would also be a good thing if the Standard Suite
were to support an optional, non-ignorable Result for 'open', so that
scriptable applications were _encouraged_ to supply one, rather than
actively discouraged by its absence from the model.

Perhaps Chris N could say whether this is a feature request that could be
conceivably entertained? (Maybe an "optional result" is not something that
the AppleScript model can even contemplate?) If so, I'll file one at
BugReporter.

--
Paul Berkowitz


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: scripting Word top copy text - should be simple, but ain't
      • From: Emmanuel <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: scripting Word top copy text - should be simple, but ain't (From: Jon Pugh <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: scripting Word top copy text - should be simple, but ain't
  • Next by Date: Re: scripting Word top copy text - should be simple, but ain't
  • Previous by thread: Re: scripting Word top copy text - should be simple, but ain't
  • Next by thread: Re: scripting Word top copy text - should be simple, but ain't
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread