Re: scripting Word top copy text - should be simple, but ain't
Re: scripting Word top copy text - should be simple, but ain't
- Subject: Re: scripting Word top copy text - should be simple, but ain't
- From: Paul Berkowitz <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:51:48 -0700
- Thread-topic: scripting Word top copy text - should be simple, but ain't
On 4/27/06 11:38 AM, "Emmanuel" <email@hidden> wrote:
> At 8:41 AM -0700 4/27/06, Paul Berkowitz wrote:
>> But it would also be a good thing if the Standard Suite
>> were to support an optional, non-ignorable Result for 'open'
>
> It would certainly be cool that all applications do like Smile does,
> that is, having their "open" command return a reference to the newly
> opened object (or whatever makes sense in the particular context),
> but I don't think anything prevents a programmer from having his
> "open" command return whatever he decides.
That's good. I'll file that as a feature-request type bug, then with Word.
;-)
>
> As you know, the Standard Suite is more of a recommendation than anything
> else.
I never really know what I know, with regard to AppleScript application
implementation. If there are real rules anywhere, I don't know where to find
them. Inside "Inside Macintosh"? Are they updated for OS X?
--
Paul Berkowitz
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden