• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Various Qs about Intel and AppleScript
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Various Qs about Intel and AppleScript


  • Subject: Re: Various Qs about Intel and AppleScript
  • From: Christopher Nebel <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:13:30 -0800

On Jan 11, 2006, at 1:42 PM, jj wrote:

Hmmm... Now that you mention it, I'm just working in a project which reads compiled scripts and extracts certain data (eg, aliases and raw apple-events)... But if the compiler works the same in both PowerPC and Intel, it should write the same exact bytes to the scpt, and it won't be a problem...

Yes, though you do have to be aware that you're reading big-endian data all the time. If you were to build your project for Intel, you'd probably need some changes.


To answer the particular question of "read" and "write", they always read and write big-endian data -- we made it that way so existing data files would work on Intel systems. You don't have to do anything special.

I know nobody will use AS for intensive Unicode (kind of) tasks, but won't be this affect speed?

Yes, but not so you'd notice. The cost of swapping is negligible compared to the cost of the I/O.


Appart from this, if (read above) the compiler compiles the same code in a Intel machine, will it run thru Rosetta? (more
speedless)

No. In memory, everything is native-endian. What's really affected is the loading and storing of scripts -- they're byte-swapped as necessary at that time; run-time isn't affected at all.


I'm sure Apple considered (now or before) the option of an entire re-design of the AS language (as well as just trashing it). Will Apple do it sooner or later, or this is an absolute NO? Are you already working on it? It's only curiosity, as the old ASLG is not a so-outdated document, and the app I mentioned works fine for compiled scripts dated from 1993 ;-)

I am legally obliged to not give a complete answer to that question, but I will say that we plan to continue supporting existing AppleScript scripts.



--Chris Nebel AppleScript and Automator Engineering

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: Various Qs about Intel and AppleScript (From: jj <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: desktop picture
  • Next by Date: Re: desktop picture
  • Previous by thread: Re: Various Qs about Intel and AppleScript
  • Next by thread: desktop picture
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread