• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: To shell or not to shell (was Re: URL Access Redux)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: To shell or not to shell (was Re: URL Access Redux)


  • Subject: Re: To shell or not to shell (was Re: URL Access Redux)
  • From: Malcolm Fitzgerald <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 13:42:05 +1000


On 23/05/2006, at 10:55 AM, Stockly, Ed wrote:

If there's a proclamation that it's not appropriate for this list, or if a specific poster says it's not what they want I'll accept that, but having this debate with third-parties each time it comes up seems counterproductive.


OK, I think I complain about this more than anyone else because I'm concerned that this list is becoming more and more a list for shell scripters than for AppleScripters and that makes this list less and less hospitable to AppleScripters, especially new AppleScripters.

This list was started because the MacScripter's list became more of a Frontier list than anything else and you couldn't ask a simple AppleScript question without getting a flood of Usertalk solutions that would drown out the AppleScript answers the user was looking for.

The same thing is happening now. It's as if this list has been hijacked by shell scripting and the humble AppleScripter is barely being supported anymore. And the new AppleScripter, who's drawn to the technology by the English like syntax and the beauty of the AppleScript language and the robust interapplication technology, is bombarded by this shell scripting gibberish (at least that's what a typical shell script looks like to a typical Mac user) and nearly always pointed away from AppleScript and towards shell scripting.

That's a good point Ed and well made.

The particular instance that started this discussion was when I recommended cURL to the OP who was trying to script URL Access. In those circumstances I'd do it all again because the OP may not know that URL Access scripting is flaky and bound for failure. The OP may not know that there is a very good tool provided on the shell which is excellent and easy to use.

My intention was to give the OP the benefit of my experience of working with URL Access Scripting and to point the way to a robust alternative. The OP may then discover that they want to write AppleScript, no matter how great cURL is. Then they may want to build an AppleScript library which would allow them to send messages to cURL via AppleScript in an english-like syntax. Then they could ask here and I'm sure they'd get lots of help because that strikes me as the sort of challenge that the AS-list loves.

I can see shell scripting questions cropping up here all the time because they can provide potential solutions to tasks in an AppleScripted work-flow.

malcolm

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >To shell or not to shell (was Re: URL Access Redux) (From: "Stockly, Ed" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: To shell or not to shell (was Re: URL Access Redux)
  • Next by Date: A problem with signs
  • Previous by thread: Re: To shell or not to shell (was Re: URL Access Redux)
  • Next by thread: Re: To shell or not to shell (was Re: URL Access Redux)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread