• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Things I thought I knew, but didn't - variable scope in repeat loops
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Things I thought I knew, but didn't - variable scope in repeat loops


  • Subject: Re: Things I thought I knew, but didn't - variable scope in repeat loops
  • From: Richard Rönnbäck <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 10:39:16 +0100
  • Thread-topic: Things I thought I knew, but didn't - variable scope in repeat loops

Thanks Mark,

You got me right, I was thinking of other languages where one increments the
counter.

It turns out that my old habit of using unique loop variables is sound after
all, as this example shows:

set i to "hi, mom!"

repeat with i from 1 to 10
    say i
end repeat

say i

So while setting i to something else does not affect the loop, the loop
affects the variable i.




> Från: "Mark J. Reed" <email@hidden>
> Datum: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:10:14 -0500
> Till: has <email@hidden>
> Kopia: <email@hidden>
> Ämne: Re: Things I thought I knew, but didn't - variable scope in repeat loops
>
> I think the OP might have been confused by the fact that the loop
> control variable is stateless in Applescript.  That is, when you do
> this:
>
> repeat with i from 1 to 10
>
> Applescript builds a list of values (or an iterator/generator) and
> sets i to the next value at the top of the loop; it doesn't look at
> the current value of i to determine what the next value of i should
> be.   So you can do anything you want to i inside the loop and it
> won't affect the loop control logic:
>
> repeat with i from 1 to 10
>    set i to "hi, mom!"
>    say i
> end repeat
>
> Some languages, on the other hand, implement counting loops by
> incrementing the value of the counter (or, as in the case of C, leave
> it up to the programmer, who usually chooses to use an increment
> step).  In such a language, this set of nested loops would only
> execute the outer loop once:
>
> for i=1 to 3
>     for i=1 to 3
>         print i
>     rof
> rof
>
> Other languages, like Pascal, treat loop control variables specially
> and won't even compile an attempt to use the same variable; BASIC uses
> the variable to pair the top and bottom of the loop, so hitting the
> bottom of the outermost loop will generate a runtime error.
>  _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> AppleScript-Users mailing list      (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> edband.net
> Archives: http://lists.apple.com/archives/applescript-users
>
> This email sent to email@hidden

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
AppleScript-Users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
Archives: http://lists.apple.com/archives/applescript-users

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Things I thought I knew, but didn't - variable scope in repeat loops
      • From: Doug McNutt <email@hidden>
    • Re: Things I thought I knew, but didn't - variable scope in repeat loops
      • From: "Mark J. Reed" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Things I thought I knew, but didn't - variable scope in repeat loops (From: "Mark J. Reed" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Things I thought I knew, but didn't - variable scope in repeat loops
  • Next by Date: Re: Thirteen Scripters Scripting
  • Previous by thread: Re: Things I thought I knew, but didn't - variable scope in repeat loops
  • Next by thread: Re: Things I thought I knew, but didn't - variable scope in repeat loops
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread