Re: Libraries and effiency
Re: Libraries and effiency
- Subject: Re: Libraries and effiency
- From: Tetsuro KURITA <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 19:12:57 +0900
> It may be preferable from a developers point of view, but it isn't so for a user, which then will have to track down what is a miss, because he hasn't got that version installed, and the system are showing know errors about missing files because it found something higher up in the tree.
My answer is loading libraries at compile time for scripts for distributions.
> I think different versions of something should be reflected by their filenames, in order to trap what is installed and not installed, when using such a load mechanism as Tetsuro's.
I agree with your opinion. ModuleLoader should have functions related
with management of libraries versions in the future.
But If I implemented a mechanism loading libraries with specifying versions,
Nobody will use it at this time. Because AppleScript modules/libraries are
not widely distributed unfortunately. It looks that the programming style
using libraries/modules is not common in AppleScripters.
Supporting library versions is not difficult. I have some ideas. If I feel requirements, I will implement it.
=======================================================
Tetsuro KURITA
E-mail: email@hidden
http://homepage.mac.com/tkurita/scriptfactory/en/
=======================================================
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
AppleScript-Users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
Archives: http://lists.apple.com/archives/applescript-users
This email sent to email@hidden