Re: Libraries and effiency
Re: Libraries and effiency
- Subject: Re: Libraries and effiency
- From: Philip Aker <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 04:29:58 -0700
On 2010-08-10, at 08:01:32, email@hidden wrote:
> Why an Osax rather than an FBA?
Here's what I wrote in the previous reply. Sometimes it's good to read the whole story :-)
>>> At this point the "OSAX" become a FBA and should be developed and distributed as such, which is probably the best way to go for the library loaders.
>>
>> Cow patty.
>>
>> If someone pays for an OSAX, it means they don't want an FBA. Speed counts in the video world.
Philip Aker
echo email@hidden@nl | tr a-z@. p-za-o.@
Democracy: Two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
AppleScript-Users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
Archives: http://lists.apple.com/archives/applescript-users
This email sent to email@hidden