Re: uneditable [OT]
Re: uneditable [OT]
- Subject: Re: uneditable [OT]
- From: "John C. Welch" <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 22:17:06 -0400
- Thread-topic: uneditable [OT]
On 5/6/13 4:20 AM, "Christopher Stone" < email@hidden> wrote:
On May 05, 2013, at 23:45, John C. Welch < email@hidden> wrote: because…four extra characters…
nope, don't get it. Don't care to.
also, how is "set this to that" HARDER to read than "this = that". for one, the latter is more ambiguous.
But again, please, the entire obsession with minor bits of extra typing in programming is something I've never understood, nor do I care to have it explained to me. I understand the history of it, but we no longer need to worry about filling 4K of RAM.
I find it depressing that in many ways, programming is still stuck in the mid 1980s.
______________________________________________________________________
Hey John,
You have an opinion, and you don't care about anyone else's opinion? :D
That doesn't make you right.
I've heard it explained over and over. It still sounds like the most picayune problem in programming. Ever. -- Yes, popping a paper bag in the mall makes a very loud noise. Yes, you can hear that shit echoing all through the place. Yes, rent-a-cops all suck. |
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
AppleScript-Users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
Archives: http://lists.apple.com/archives/applescript-users
This email sent to email@hidden