• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: uneditable [OT]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: uneditable [OT]


  • Subject: Re: uneditable [OT]
  • From: Alex Zavatone <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 13:49:53 -0400

Dude. In 1995, when I did this, I was nowhere near being an experienced programmer. Lingo is based off of HyperTalk, the scripting language of HyperCard and is straightforward and effective, without being uselessly verbose.

Look up the Lingo programming language to see for yourself.

Sent from my iPod

On May 7, 2013, at 12:38 PM, "John C. Welch" <email@hidden> wrote:

> it's so awesome how people who are experienced programmers are so willing
> to look at something that has caused confusion for new programmers for
> decades and assume it's because new programmers are stupid.
>
> It really reminds me why I find talking to programmers to rarely be
> enjoyable, and why the programmers that think that way almost never manage
> to create anything humans would want to use.
>
> On 5/7/13 2:52 AM, "Barry Wainwright" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>> And therein lies the problem. To someone only educated to school grade
>> math, maybe equality and assignment *are* the same. To people
>> (programmers?) educated a little beyond that point, there is a world of
>> difference between the two.
>>
>> The first computer language I am aware of to use the equality operator
>> for an assignment was BASIC - way back in the 70s. Early implementations
>> of BASIC *required* the use of the keyword LET - as in 'LET X=10' to
>> disambiguate between an assignment and an equality test. Later iterations
>> of that language allowed the LET keyword to be optional.
>>
>> Now BASIC may have been many things and it was the first introduction to
>> programming for many people, but a paragon of good practice it never was,
>> and it's worst practices should never be held up as such.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Barry Wainwright
>>
>>
>> On 7 May 2013, at 04:07, Alex Zavatone <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't know what problems you have with understanding the complexities
>>> of x = 1, but I value my time, and I don't want to waste it being
>>> needlessly verbose, when the shorter form is just as easily
>>> understandable to anyone who has taken and passed grade school math.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> AppleScript-Users mailing list      (email@hidden)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> m
>> Archives: http://lists.apple.com/archives/applescript-users
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> AppleScript-Users mailing list      (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> Archives: http://lists.apple.com/archives/applescript-users
>
> This email sent to email@hidden

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
AppleScript-Users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
Archives: http://lists.apple.com/archives/applescript-users

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: uneditable summary [OT] [OT] [OT] [OT] [OT] [OT]
      • From: Steve Bird <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: uneditable [OT] (From: "John C. Welch" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: uneditable [OT]
  • Next by Date: Re: evalhate without parsing?
  • Previous by thread: Re: uneditable [OT]
  • Next by thread: Re: uneditable summary [OT] [OT] [OT] [OT] [OT] [OT]
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread