Re: uneditable [OT]
Re: uneditable [OT]
- Subject: Re: uneditable [OT]
- From: Shane Stanley <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 10:51:50 +1000
On 08/05/2013, at 4:51 AM, Paul Berkowitz <email@hidden> wrote:
> Please let this be the last word. Nigel has said everything that needs to be
> said. Take his words as wisdom.
I've been away on vacation, so please allow me an extension, based on relevance.
The OP was was using the word "uneditable" in reference to saved AS scripts. Calling them "uneditable" is a poor choice in this context, whether the word exists or not, because it fails to convey the fact that they not only cannot be edited, but they also cannot be read. The term Apple uses, "run-only", seems to me a better choice, and I suspect it also translates nicely.
--
Shane Stanley <email@hidden>
'AppleScriptObjC Explored' <www.macosxautomation.com/applescript/apps/>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
AppleScript-Users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
Archives: http://lists.apple.com/archives/applescript-users
This email sent to email@hidden