Re: Why Lion? [was: Re: Informal Poll]
Re: Why Lion? [was: Re: Informal Poll]
- Subject: Re: Why Lion? [was: Re: Informal Poll]
- From: Alex Zavatone <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:20:22 -0400
Lion's actually pretty bad. Mountain Lion is a bit better, IMO. There are several issues in the Finder that are annoying, but it's faster than Lion, and much less flakey.
By "minimum out", do you mean that your software can't run on Mountain Lion?
On Jun 16, 2014, at 11:14 AM, Jon Pugh wrote:
> On Jun 16, 2014, at 6:01 AM, Shane Stanley wrote:
>> On 16 Jun 2014, at 10:55 pm, Chris Paveglio <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> At my company's office most of our Macs are still on Lion (10.7.5) and a
>>> few Mountain, but no Mavericks.
>>
>> I'm curious: Why Lion? I guess I can understand why people cling to 10.6, but Lion seems an odd choice. Is it something to do with being able to run particular software?
>
> My MacPro is stuck on Lion. I could have stayed on 10.6, but there’s actually some software than minimums out at 10.7, like newer versions of VMWare Fusion, and I no longer really need my old PPC software.
>
> Jon
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> AppleScript-Users mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> Archives: http://lists.apple.com/archives/applescript-users
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
AppleScript-Users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
Archives: http://lists.apple.com/archives/applescript-users
This email sent to email@hidden