• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: AUGD: .Mac vs Google
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AUGD: .Mac vs Google


  • Subject: Re: AUGD: .Mac vs Google
  • From: Melanie Schoenfeld <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 10:11:30 -0700

This was such an interesting thread that I took it to a MUG meeting, to see what our members had to say about Google vs .Mac.

For me, and for the members at that meeting, the most important difference between Google and .Mac is this: Google makes its services first for Windows, and later accommodates Mac users. Apple makes its .Mac services first for Mac users, then later accommodates Windows.

So if a Mac user chooses to use Google, they will always be served last. Well, maybe next to last -- I think Linux is still last :-D And the service may not be as good as it is for Windows users.

It's not so much a question of loyalty to Apple as self-interest: We have invested lots of money and time in our Macs, so why would we choose a web service that thinks we're second class?

Sure, all the Google services are free, and that's not a small advantage. But most of the members at my MUG meeting said Google services are harder to find, harder to use, and the results aren't as good as with .Mac. (It's important to note that these were "ordinary" Mac users, not power users or Mac addicts. It was a Q&A meeting -- troubleshooting -- and attracted people who joined the club for the help we provide, and for the fun. For them, the fact that Google Page Creator doesn't work with Safari is a big deal.)

The lack of an iDisk was also a big consideration, especially for those who use Backup. Anyway, the consensus was that if you use the package of services, .Mac is unquestionably the way to go. If you don't need all or most of the services, then you can save money and go with Google.

However, while hoping that .Mac will survive the competition from free services like Google, the members also agreed that Apple could do a better job with it. .Mac Groups came in for a lot of criticism. Many people had tried them, but no one had any success with them, because they're too hard for friends and family to access.

I've been a Mac user and MUG member for many years, and it seems to me that Apple's success has changed the attitude of many Mac users. They expect to be first in line for the good stuff, not last or next to last :-)

Melanie Schoenfeld
email@hidden
http://www.macswest.org

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Augd mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: AUGD: .Mac vs Google (From: Dale Gillard <email@hidden>)
 >Re: AUGD: .Mac vs Google (From: Paul Richards <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: AUGD: Mug InfoManager for Monday, August 7, 2006
  • Next by Date: AUGD: The MUG Center Briefing - 8/6/06
  • Previous by thread: Re: AUGD: .Mac vs Google
  • Next by thread: Re: AUGD: .Mac vs Google
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread