Re: Re: The activation time of the application running in the background
Re: Re: The activation time of the application running in the background
- Subject: Re: Re: The activation time of the application running in the background
- From: "email@hidden" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 09:39:01 +0800
|
Hi,
I agree with Etan's idea too. We will try
it.
Thanks All.
Date: 2012-08-07 07:36
Subject: Re: The activation time of the application running in
the background
Sounds like a good approach.
Thanks,
Joakim
On Aug 6, 2012, at 3:34 PM, Etan Kissling wrote:
Hey,
Couldn't you measure the RSSI value on the peripheral, and only send a
notification to the iPhone when the RSSI value exceeds a specific
threshold?
Then, you could manage the power more precisely on the peripheral, while
the iPhone can sleep most of the time.
Etan
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Jean-Yves Avenard
<email@hidden> wrote:
On 07/08/2012, at 0:43, Joakim Linde < email@hidden>
wrote: > > Hi zz_zhang, > > You might want to
consider reading the RSSI value on the peripheral side instead of on the
central side. > > Thanks, >
Joakim > >
I have read this
recommendation a few times and was also told the same
thing at
WWDC.
However, I fail to see why it would make any difference from a
power
usage point of view.
The application will be woken up just
as often if it was the device
advertising its RSSI value very often.
_______________________________________________ Do
not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Bluetooth-dev
mailing list ( email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update
your Subscription:
|
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Bluetooth-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden