• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Any better solutions to BLE caching?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Any better solutions to BLE caching?


  • Subject: Re: Any better solutions to BLE caching?
  • From: Rick Mann <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:07:22 -0700

On Apr 19, 2013, at 02:36 , Etan Kissling <email@hidden> wrote:

> Excerpt from https://developer.apple.com/hardwaredrivers/BluetoothDesignGuidelines.pdf
> The iOS device implements the GAP Service Changed characteristic, because the database contents can change at any time. The Bluetooth accessory should therefore support the Characteristic Value Indication of this characteristic and, upon receiving indications, invalidate its database cache accordingly. See the Bluetooth 4.0 specification, Volume 3, Part G, Section 7.1.

Hmm. That excerpt seems to say that the *accessory* needs to respond to the indication by invalidating its own caches, rather than saying iOS will do the same thing.

> Did not test this, but if it works, you should get a callback in the CBPeripheralDelegate (didInvalidateServices or something similar).

So, there's no such delegate method, but I think the thing to do is get the value change indication for that specific characteristic. I'll try to implement that, and hopefully the caching won't prevent that characteristic from showing up.

Actually, huh. I only change the service when I flash the BLE112, so I don't know how to properly send the update, without sending it every time the thing boots.


--
Rick




 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Bluetooth-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Any better solutions to BLE caching?
      • From: Louis Gerbarg <email@hidden>
    • Re: Any better solutions to BLE caching?
      • From: Jason Conn <email@hidden>
    • Re: Any better solutions to BLE caching?
      • From: Etan Kissling <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Any better solutions to BLE caching? (From: Rick Mann <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Any better solutions to BLE caching? (From: Gareth MacLeod <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Any better solutions to BLE caching? (From: Etan Kissling <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Parsing Advertisement data
  • Next by Date: Re: BLE scan under simulator finds service twice
  • Previous by thread: Re: Any better solutions to BLE caching?
  • Next by thread: Re: Any better solutions to BLE caching?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread