• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Cocoa downgrade from openstep?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cocoa downgrade from openstep?


  • Subject: Re: Cocoa downgrade from openstep?
  • From: Scott Anguish <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 16:29:27 -0400

On Friday, August 10, 2001, at 04:06 PM, Finlay Dobbie wrote:


On Friday, August 10, 2001, at 01:06 am, Ondra Cada wrote:

From the ObjC viewpoint (!!!) IOKit is not and can't ever be
object-oriented, since there's nothing like ObjC objects in C++, and IOKit,
alas, is C++-based :(((

From any *NORMAL* programmers viewpoint, IOKit is object-oriented.

I'm not familiar with DriverKit and how it worked, but I suspect that IOKit is lowerlevel, since I can't really see running the ObjC runtime environment inside the kernel as a feasible thing to do.


Actually, Stan Shebbs mentioned something about this at the Stepwise BOF at MacWorld back in January..

The gist of it was that they'd probably have been better off sticking with Obj-C rather than the EmbeddedC++ stuff they went to.


References: 
 >Re: Cocoa downgrade from openstep? (From: Finlay Dobbie <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Cocoa downgrade from openstep?
  • Next by Date: Re: err_sys
  • Previous by thread: Re: Cocoa downgrade from openstep?
  • Next by thread: Re: Cocoa downgrade from openstep?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread