• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Cocoa downgrade from openstep?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cocoa downgrade from openstep?


  • Subject: Re: Cocoa downgrade from openstep?
  • From: Scott Anguish <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 19:31:54 -0400

On Friday, August 10, 2001, at 06:58 PM, Andre John Mas wrote:


On Friday, August 10, 2001, at 04:55 PM, Rosyna wrote:

This I find amusing. Resource forks are being depreciated for bundles (not cross platform, show up as arbitrary folders),

This issue could be got round if some JAR (Java ARchive) style solution was used. Sure it
would require a binary loader that recognized the ZIP file format, but that is hardly
too difficult to resolve. I think such an idea had been suggested at some point and
then chucked in the trash.

There really isn't anything to resolve with this.

Fact is, bundles are just directory/file collections, and as such are compatible across virtually EVERY file system

file extensions as well..

True, other OS's don't use Obj-C for their libs by default, but any procedural code can be called by Obj-C, and GNU compiler is widely available.


  • Prev by Date: Re: Windows without traffic lights
  • Next by Date: WriteToFile:atomically: question
  • Previous by thread: Re: Cocoa downgrade from openstep?
  • Next by thread: NSWorkspace getInfoForFile:application:type:
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread