• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: EOF Advocacy
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: EOF Advocacy


  • Subject: Re: EOF Advocacy
  • From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 21:27:55 +0200

Heather,

hallo? Are you here?

>>>>>> Scott Anguish (SA) wrote at Mon, 13 Aug 2001 14:53:27 -0400:
SA> Heather Hickman is the Cocoa Technology Manager (I hope that's your
SA> title Heather) and she really seemed to listen to this (over and over
SA> and over) at WWDC.. I'm sure she reads this list
SA>
SA> but I doubt that there is much you can do to convince Apple of this.

Well, looks to me Apple can do one of the following:

(a) support EOF as part of Cocoa (even for extra money that would be great:
I would pay at least $XXX for that, perhaps even more, and I bet I'm not
alone);
(b) publish the sources, so as _we_ can do that, somewhat like it happened
ages ago with MusicKit;
(c) tell us straight something as "Nope, we won't do (a) nor (b) since
Oracle paid us a fortune not to do so, so as their proprietary API is the
best way for OS X. So forget portable and easily made database apps in OS X,
and be happy".

Well, is there any (d)? I mean, any sensible one?
---
Ondra Cada
OCSoftware: email@hidden http://www.ocs.cz
private email@hidden http://www.ocs.cz/oc


References: 
 >Re: EOF Advocacy (From: Scott Anguish <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Downloading html page
  • Next by Date: CLI calls
  • Previous by thread: Re: EOF Advocacy
  • Next by thread: Checkboxes in NSTableView
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread