Re: Docs
Re: Docs
- Subject: Re: Docs
- From: Phillip Mills <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 12:10:14 -0400
On 8/23/01 11:52 AM, "Chuck Toporek" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
Phillip Mills wrote:
>
>
>
> Even finding a person to type in the examples and verify that they compile
>
> would be a GIANT step in the right direction. I buy a lot of O'Reilly
>
> books, both for work and home. Obviouly, I usually like them or I'd have
>
> stopped years ago...but I feel like a sucker for having spent money on this
>
> one. It gives me the feeling that someone saw an opportunity to "Make Money
>
> Fast" and rushed it out the door with the least attention to quality and
>
> content possible.
>
>
I don't think we (or Apple) were trying to "Make Money Fast" by
>
publishing that book.
OK, I'll try to think of other reasons for the number of errors, lack of
consistency, and superficial treatment. If you have any, feel free to offer
them.
>
I think what's more important here is that we're
>
listening to our readers and taking your concerns and feedback
>
seriously. One of my goals is to work on revising "Learning Cocoa" and
>
to make sure that it meets everyones expectations.
That's a nice, "can't we all just get along," thing to say and, although I
seriouly applaud any efforts in that direction for the future, I think you
should consider issuing a recall on the original. :-/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Docs
- From: John Hörnkvist <email@hidden>
- Re: Docs
- From: Jonathan Hendry <email@hidden>
- Re: Docs
- From: "John C. Randolph" <email@hidden>
- Re: Docs
- From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>
| References: | |
| | >Re: Docs (From: Chuck Toporek <email@hidden>) |