Re: C++
Re: C++
- Subject: Re: C++
- From: Chris Gehlker <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 08:40:01 -0700
On 8/28/01 5:41 AM, "Smith, Bradley" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
Well, it seems that I wait for 10.1 when I can use C++ form my main
>
application engine and use Objective-C for the UI and system interaction
>
part (using Obj-C++). This is an excellent compromise as all the hard work
>
(algorithms etc.) I can write in what I already know. Being forced to use
>
Obj-C for the rest is no big deal as I'd have to learn the UI API anyway and
>
it'll be a way to ease me into Obj-C. Who knows, I may eventually decide
>
Obj-C is better than C++ ;-)
I think you are on the right track here. I found ObjC really easy to learn.
The best thing is that ref-counted smart pointers are built right into the
language. If you have ever had a program get bogged down in copying large
objects and had to roll your own, you will come to love this feature.
Now if they would only get rid of that printf() nonsense. ;-)
--
In the midst of great joy, do not promise anyone anything. In the midst of
great anger, do not answer anyone's letter. -Chinese proverb
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: C++
- From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>
| References: | |
| | >RE: C++ (From: "Smith, Bradley" <email@hidden>) |