• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: cocoa-dev digest, Vol 1 #486 - 13 msgs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: cocoa-dev digest, Vol 1 #486 - 13 msgs


  • Subject: Re: cocoa-dev digest, Vol 1 #486 - 13 msgs
  • From: David Kopec <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 18:03:58 -0400

I have the second edition and I use it as a reference guide frequently.

On Tuesday, August 28, 2001, at 05:45 PM, cocoa-dev-
email@hidden wrote:

Message: 12
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 16:23:34 -0500
From: Chilton Webb <email@hidden>
To: email@hidden
Subject: Is K&R Still Relevant?

With all this talk of which language to learn first, second, and never,
ever, ever, I'm wondering what the consensus is on Kernighan and
Ritchie's "The C Programming Language". I haven't heard it mentioned
recently. At one time, it was the 'bible' of C programming. Is it still
as important in the Cocoa world?

-Chilton (who has an opinion on this, but is curious what others think
nonetheless)


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: cocoa-dev digest, Vol 1 #486 - 13 msgs
      • From: Chris Gehlker <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: Learning to program Cocoa
  • Next by Date: Re: If Cocoa Has Xor Draw
  • Previous by thread: Re: Is K&R Still Relevant?
  • Next by thread: Re: cocoa-dev digest, Vol 1 #486 - 13 msgs
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread