• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Is K&R Still Relevant?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Is K&R Still Relevant?


  • Subject: Re: Is K&R Still Relevant?
  • From: James Bredijk <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 08:38:52 -0400

On Tuesday, August 28, 2001, at 05:23 PM, Chilton Webb wrote:

With all this talk of which language to learn first, second, and never, ever, ever, I'm wondering what the consensus is on Kernighan and Ritchie's "The C Programming Language". I haven't heard it mentioned recently. At one time, it was the 'bible' of C programming. Is it still as important in the Cocoa world?

-Chilton (who has an opinion on this, but is curious what others think nonetheless)

K & R will always be relevant as long as 'C' is still around. And 'C' isn't going anywhere ;o)

I'm sure that most of us are not willing to surrender 'C' just yet :^) Since Cocoa is OS X development only, and there are plenty of 8.x & 9.x machines to program for, 'C' (along with C++, Carbon and even some Pascal) will be around for quite a while.


James


James Bredijk
email@hidden
---------------------------
I know something about everything, more or less - hopefully more,
but usually less. No warranty, guaranteed or sanity is implied.


References: 
 >Is K&R Still Relevant? (From: Chilton Webb <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: RE: Abstract classes and methods
  • Next by Date: Saving planar bitmap data into a file
  • Previous by thread: Re: Is K&R Still Relevant?
  • Next by thread: Re: Oops! Was:Is K&R Still Relevant?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread