• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Is K&R Still Relevant?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Is K&R Still Relevant?


  • Subject: Re: Is K&R Still Relevant?
  • From: James Bredijk <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:36:33 -0400

K & R will always be relevant as long as 'C' is still around. And 'C' isn'
t going anywhere ;o)

I'm sure that most of us are not willing to surrender 'C' just yet :^) Since Cocoa is OS X development only, and there are plenty of 8.x & 9.x machines to program for, 'C' (along with C++, Carbon and even some Pascal)
will be around for quite a while.

You say that as if Obj-C weren't based on C. All of the info in K&R still applies to objective-C

--
Clark S. Cox, III

I only meant that there is more to Mac OS programming then just Cocoa. That's why I feel learning C is a good idea, and why I feel 'K & R' is still relevant.


James


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Is K&R Still Relevant?
      • From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Is K&R Still Relevant? (From: James Bredijk <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: (no subject)
  • Next by Date: Re: Abstract classes and methods
  • Previous by thread: Re: Is K&R Still Relevant?
  • Next by thread: Re: Is K&R Still Relevant?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread