• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: ObjC++ (and a word about Java, too ;-)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ObjC++ (and a word about Java, too ;-)


  • Subject: Re: ObjC++ (and a word about Java, too ;-)
  • From: Enigmarelle Development <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 19:22:07 -0500

On Wednesday, December 5, 2001, at 01:03 PM, Thomas Lachand-Robert wrote:
Anyway, "never" in a very strong word in computer fields. Probably they won't be rewritten in Cocoa in the next three years or so, I agree. But after that? Most of these apps use Navigation Services now (except XPress)
, but they didn't three years ago.

But this argument is already 3 years old. If Carbon wasn't necessary, Apple would have shipped Rhapsody. And Adobe is just NOT rewriting Photoshop 'from scratch'. It's just not gonna happen.

-john c. warner
enigmarelle development
http://www.enigmarelle.com/


References: 
 >Re: ObjC++ (and a word about Java, too ;-) (From: Thomas Lachand-Robert <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: ObjC++ (and a word about Java, too ;-)
  • Next by Date: Multiple Inheritance (not Marathon Infinity)
  • Previous by thread: Re: ObjC++ (and a word about Java, too ;-)
  • Next by thread: Re: ObjC++ (and a word about Java, too ;-)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread