• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Rep_:_ObjC++_ and_a_word_about_Java,_too_
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rep_:_ObjC++_ and_a_word_about_Java,_too_


  • Subject: Re: Rep_:_ObjC++_ and_a_word_about_Java,_too_
  • From: Stéphane Sudre <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 19:25:35 +0100

On Thursday, December 6, 2001, at 03:46 PM, Thomas Lachand-Robert wrote:

[...]
Both needs are likely to disappear. 68k apps disappeared two or three years after the introduction of the PowerPC; so I bet that in two or three years, no huge company will bother to have compatibility with OS 9.

Not bothering to have compatibility with OS 9 doesn't mean you're ready to spend a year to rewrite the whole application in Cocoa just to be able to add a Drawer to your Application and spend 3 months again to fix bugs that were not occurring in the Carbon version.

Can a final user make the difference between a Carbon App and a Cocoa one ?


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Rep_:_ObjC++_ and_a_word_about_Java,_too_
      • From: Jim Balhoff <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Rép : ObjC++ (and a word about Java, too ;-= 29 (From: Thomas Lachand-Robert <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Correction of 'Yet another...'
  • Next by Date: Re: Finder Show Info Comments
  • Previous by thread: Rép : ObjC++ (and a word about Java, too ;-= 29
  • Next by thread: Re: Rep_:_ObjC++_ and_a_word_about_Java,_too_
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread