• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Damn sisters :-)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Damn sisters :-)


  • Subject: Re: Damn sisters :-)
  • From: Riccardo Santato <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 12:19:05 +0100

>No 'implementation', 'encapsulation' or 'instanciation' in C++?

Never found them...


>Partially what you say about remapping, is true, but it is also important to
>totally rethink things. OOP is drastically different from procedural
>languages (and no, we do _not_ want a discussion on what the opposite of OOP
>is ;) on so many levels, and sometimes knowing a procedural language may
>stop you from fully seeing the power of the new language you are learning...

You're right . C++ has been a try to make C really objective but the
result is just a sad fake IMHO

--
Riccardo Santato
www.riccardosantato.com


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Damn sisters :-)
      • From: "David W. Halliday" <email@hidden>
    • Re: Damn sisters :-)
      • From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Damn sisters :-) (From: David Remahl <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: cocoa-dev digest, Vol 1 #956 - 15 msgs
  • Next by Date: Starting the screensaver from code
  • Previous by thread: Re: Damn sisters :-)
  • Next by thread: Re: Damn sisters :-)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread