Re: cocoa-dev digest, Vol 1 #999 - 7 msgs
Re: cocoa-dev digest, Vol 1 #999 - 7 msgs
- Subject: Re: cocoa-dev digest, Vol 1 #999 - 7 msgs
- From: Bradley Ford <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 16:25:20 -0500
>
I know this, i was talking about C not C++. One needs to ask ANSI why they
>
decided that
>
and and_eq etc.. were even needed at all.
>
>
why do you need xor when you can just do ^, adding new keywords at every
>
revision doesn't help make everything more understandable.
>
>
Oh well.
>
>
Have a merry christmas.
>
>
vince
A belated Merry Christmas to you too (your post was sent on 12/31/69)!
English Language Equivalents:
"C was developed in the U.S. On systems using the standard U.S. Keyboards.
But in the wider world, not all keyboards have the same symbols as U.S.
keyboards do. Therefore, the C99 standard has added alternative spellings
for the logical operators. They are defined in the iso646.h header file."
--Stephen Prata
C Primer Plus, 4th Edition
Quoted without permission.
Brad Ford
email@hidden