• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Cocoa/EOF for non-enterprise apps Re: proof of cocoa superiority?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cocoa/EOF for non-enterprise apps Re: proof of cocoa superiority?


  • Subject: Re: Cocoa/EOF for non-enterprise apps Re: proof of cocoa superiority?
  • From: Rajnish Dogra <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:32:32 -0700

On Tuesday, June 12, 2001, at 03:10 PM, Nat! wrote:

However, that does not mean EOF is an appropriate solution for every app out there. Specifically, for applications targeted at the consumer market, it very likely is not appropriate to use EOF as a solution for persistency. I.e. EOF is not a good replacement for the traditional multi-document UI that a product like, say, OmniGraffle, GraphicConverter, or Create. Nor it is appropriate to apps that are seemingly database centric like, say, iTunes or the Finder.
Thank god, someone invented the file system...

Best of all it is not patented by Apple. So they can't take it away from us. But the replacement for EOF might :-).

Thanks,

Rajnish


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Cocoa/EOF for non-enterprise apps Re: proof of cocoa superiority?
      • From: Thomas Hudson <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Cocoa/EOF for non-enterprise apps Re: proof of cocoa superiority? (From: Nat! <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Getting select click
  • Next by Date: Displaying HTML
  • Previous by thread: Re: Cocoa/EOF for non-enterprise apps Re: proof of cocoa superiority?
  • Next by thread: Re: Cocoa/EOF for non-enterprise apps Re: proof of cocoa superiority?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread