• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Serious Questions
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Serious Questions


  • Subject: Re: Serious Questions
  • From: Finlay Dobbie <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 22:53:32 +0100

On Saturday, May 26, 2001, at 10:46 pm, Brian Howard wrote:

Also, please understand that I have already read everything I could find, but it is hard to absorb everything at once. No doubt the fog will lift at some point. That said, I still think the level of documentation from Apple is abysmal. They are betting the whole store on OS X and Cocoa is KEY. They need all the developers they can rustle up, even lames like me.

There are holes in Apple's Cocoa documentation, but it's not THAT bad. It's well organized, and the docs for most of the main classes are pretty understandable. The main focus has been Carbon because that's what matters at the moment - porting the OS 9 base of applications to OS X is the prime concern for most developers. The Cocoa documentation could be a whole lot better, but it's not as bad as you make it out to be.

-- Finlay


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Serious Questions
      • From: Brian Howard <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Serious Questions (From: Brian Howard <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Serious Questions
  • Next by Date: Re: Serious Questions
  • Previous by thread: Re: Serious Questions
  • Next by thread: Re: Serious Questions
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread