• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: ObjC Method naming
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ObjC Method naming


  • Subject: Re: ObjC Method naming
  • From: Marco Scheurer <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 01:52:25 +0200

You won't for long. Once you get going I can almost guarantee that
you'll prefer Objective-C. Everyone else seems to. (The one major
exception are the mathematicians among us. Writing things like
quaternion classes that do operator overloading is more convenient in
C++. That comes at the huge cost of all the other C++ programmers
overloading operators willy-nilly to do who knows what.)

Nah... mathematicians prefer APL don't they? How could one live with the small, incoherent set of operators available for overloading in C++?

Marco Scheurer
Sen:te, Lausanne, Switzerland http://www.sente.ch


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: ObjC Method naming
      • From: "David W. Halliday" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: ObjC Method naming (From: Greg Titus <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: ObjC Method naming
  • Next by Date: Re: filesystem notifications
  • Previous by thread: Re: ObjC Method naming
  • Next by thread: Re: ObjC Method naming
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread