• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: NSString and gdb
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NSString and gdb


  • Subject: Re: NSString and gdb
  • From: Andreas Monitzer <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 15:26:20 +0100

On Sunday, November 25, 2001, at 02:57 , Mason Mark wrote:

I choose the higher resolution for the same reasons most people do, I guess:

a) Can see more lines of source code on the screen at one time.

b) Can fit .h and .m files side by side while still having them reasonably wide and useful

c) Can read PDFs, web pages, etc. comfortably in full-page view mode

d) 1600x1200 is the native, manufacturer-recommended resolution of my monitor

e) etc etc etc, basically higher resolution is better in general

a & b are the reasons I choose to install a second monitor. By having more physical screen space, I can read even small text *and* display many things at once.

Costs: 0 for Rage Pro, 58.13 for second 15" display (used)

This system scales up to four or five displays, depending on your PowerMac model and your desktop space, which is a total resolution of about 4096x768+1280x1024, still maintaining readability of all texts.

andy


References: 
 >Re: NSString and gdb (From: Mason Mark <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: NSString and gdb
  • Next by Date: Re: old-style plists
  • Previous by thread: Re: NSString and gdb
  • Next by thread: Re: NSString and gdb
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread